Proper school organization and advantages of accelerated schools
Abstract
The school is an organization, which is an institution that brings
together human and physical resources to achieve its objectives through defined
policies and programs. It may be defined as “a place where organizational
learning is built in order that collaboration, knowledge, creativity and
teamwork processes have a collective meaning and valued” Layton (1991).
Additionally, schools may be defined as organizations where individual
abilities are constantly grown to produce results, Peter.S (1990). Hanover
looks at school improvement ‘as a systematic way of planning school improvement
and tracking it over time’ Ontario Ministry of Education (2000). Going by this
definition, a school improvement plan may thus be looked at “as a roadmap
setting out the changes a school needs to make in order to improve on the
students’ achievement, showing how and when these changes will be made” North
Carolina Department of public instruction,( 2013). Looking into this critically
may mean “quality improvement” defined as “the disciplined use of quantitative
and qualitative methods to improve the effectiveness, equity, timeliness and
efficiency of service delivery process and systems” Parks et al (2013).
Therefore, as schools embrace improvement and planning processes, the concept
of quality improvement should be embedded into the everyday activities. As
such, it can be seen from the above definitions that schools continuous
improvement are distinct processes that may be aimed at bridging the gap
between the school's current level performance and it's actual potential North
Carolina Department of Instruction (2013). Thus, school improvement should
involve the integration of quality improvement in the daily work of people in
the school system Parks et al (2013).
Key words: Organization, improvement, Accelerated schools,
quality, renewal, outcomes, efficiency, effectiveness, planning.
Introduction
Organizations may be
classified as formal or informal which is determined by availability or lack of
rules, regulations, systems and procedures. Chester .B (1948) defines formal
organizations as “a system of consciously coordinated activities or forces of
two or more persons, a definite measure of authority, responsibility and accountability.”
Informal organizations are without any authority, as they arise from personal
and social relations of people..They lack laid down procedures, regulations or
organizational structure. Organization is the arrangement of resources, both
human and physical to achieve the desired outcomes of an organization. Sheldon
puts it this way, “organization is the formation of an effective machine
through which management and administration achieve their goals”. School
organization involves several parts that steer towards the achieving of a
‘whole institution’. The parts include efficiency, coordination, sound planning,
clarification of functions, giving direction and systematic execution. Not too
long in the past, the school has had to assume new roles, set new goals,
highlight new methods of action to counter or deal with challenges coming from
problems facing the society. As such, it is important to develop a school that
endeavors and purposes through the development of all internal professional
resources, to pursue its objectives with the maximum efficiency and
effectiveness (Early, Maxwell et al., 2007). The improvement of quality, in
this context, is presented as the requisite condition for intended renewal.
Impact of Proper Organization and
Improvement in educational institutions
Quality issues have affected all sectors of service delivery and
the education has not been left behind. However, as much as this trend is
catching up in every other sector, it is risky to carry out it out mechanically
in the education sector, without careful of evaluation systems putting into
consideration every specific. Nevertheless, how can proper organization lead to
improvement in a school? There may not be a ‘good’ answer to the above question
as each school may need a specific study and the findings may vary depending on
the possible interventions needed and the priorities that are in place already.
It is therefore, worth noting that, there is a risk of planning for improvement
through the imitation of "success" experiences borrowed directly from
another. This is because what works in one school may not fit another one on
one; but may be a starting point of self-introspection
for another. After all, the improvement indicators by one school are presented
as a condition for implementing the school improvement process for another in a
graduated mode, according to European Union indications (Westerheijden,
Stensaker, & Rosa, 2007).
Concerning proper organization in a school, this implies promoting
novel ways of teaching, by enhancing all professional resources, with the highest
level of efficiency and effectiveness as well as its objectives. This is through
the development of solid actionable plans that translate into results that are clearly
identifiable and measurable (Van Maele & Van Houtte, 2011).
It seems significant to look at proper organization towards school
improvement as a plan that requires resources, and collaboration of all
stakeholders of the school. This would allow for setting own priorities and
goals with learners’ needs at heart and allow for progressive initiative
towards improvement interventions. This in turn will translate into improved
learning outcomes for the students; thus better prospects at higher levels of
education as well as career pathways (Pedder & Opfer, 2013). This improvement
from schools could then translate to benefits for economies by supporting the
youth in building skills and knowledge. This course calls for proper
organization of all factors in school, for the learners to acquire more skills
and knowledge necessary for the world of work or higher levels of learning
(Hongboontri & Keawkhong, 2014).
Six essential conditions for improvement on
a school internal level
1. The strategy employed is
solid enough to achieve the objectives or set goal.
2. The link line between
the school administration office and leadership to what students will
experience in the classroom is clearly outlined.
3. The educators in roles in relation to this strategy have
expectations clearly drawn out for them.
4. The learning that is required in order for the educators to do
what they are being asked to essentially is professional learning plans for all
stakeholders involved in the plan.
5. Evidence of progress for each objective is specified which
often entails creating instruments and or programs that do not exist yet.
Organization as a function of management leads to planning which
in turn leads to success. In general, two-year period is necessary for proper
implementation of set goals as well as meet the requirements of why the goals
were set. After this period new plans may be set, thus the school is released
from the current organizational plan requirements. Effectiveness of each
planning cycle will be measured via internal and external outcomes.
Performance indicators in relation to proper organization.
&Performance indicators are important tools that assist
schools in reviewing their development priorities and effectiveness of major
tasks in relation to proper organization. This is important in order for proper
refinement of school development to enhance desired learning outcomes. That
said, there is need to look at the following areas within an organizational plan,
which has performance indicators to measure improvement.
Area
performance indicators |
1. School management:
2. Professional
leadership :
3.Curriculum and assessment:
4.Student learning and teaching:
5. Partnership: 6.Attitude and behavior: 7.Participation and achievement academic |
1.planning, implementation and evaluation 2. Leadership and monitoring collaboration and support
professional development 3.Curriculum organization, implementation, performance
assessment and evaluation 4.Support for students
development school climate 5.Home or school
corporation, links with external organizations 6. Affective development
and attitude social development 7.performance and non
academic performance Acknowledgement: (Hughes & Bartlett,
2000). |
Accelerated schools
Many elementary schools provide children with an education that forms
a basis of their later access to higher levels of education and career
pathways. All learners are put together in this traditional learning style and
their pathways are differentiated using their grades in assessment tests.
Accelerated schools on the other hand provide a complex series of changes in
schools to ‘design accelerated learning’, the learning of at-risk children (TAS
2020). Dr Henry with his colleagues developed accelerated schools concept which
aims to:
1. Create new and supportive school culture that assists children
and set high expectation for teachers and students.
2.Institute new governance structure process that takes into
account schools’ weaknesses and strengths, work groups devoted to school issues
of concern and school meetings in which important decisions are made through
consensus.
3 .Use of powerful learning and teaching strategies that are
interactive, challenging and project based as opposed to traditional
pedagogical methods.
4. Receive technical assistance in implementing the reforms from
other collaborators in the education sector.
Impact of accelerated schools on student
performance
I.Academic excellence and
achievement.
ii .Guiding our students through nurturing within the school
environment.
iii. Setting high expectations for the learner in collaboration
with the parents and communities.
iv. Preparing learners with knowledge, tools and skills to help
them become citizens who are productive, engaged and lifelong learners by instilling
the importance of good academic performance and the strong character right from
my young age.
v. Enrich life of students
and families through a blended approach that looks into academics, cultural and
community forecast programs.
Conclusion
The accelerated schools believe that they produce learners who are
all rounded and highly prepared for success at higher levels of education as
well as in the different career pathways; for they are well-informed and
productive citizenry (The Accelerated Schools, 2020). As for the school, they
must organize every factor aimed at improvement with their
"customers" in mind. The students are the foremost users of their services,
followed by their families, then the world of work. However, organization for
improvement cannot be termed as project with deadlines, as it is an ongoing
process that continues to review its services to establish logic of continuous
improvement (Lieto, 2002).The objective is to properly organize all factors within
the institution, thus develop ability to efficiently improve on the outcomes.
Comments
Post a Comment